AI-powered delivery date estimates to boost conversion
Give shoppers peace of mind and protect and grow your bottom line
Personalized tracking experiences to build brand loyalty
Returns and exchanges management to mitigate fraud and reward best customers
Proactive communication to drive customer lifetime value
Delivery claim management to tackle fraud and build trust

Every retailer wants to give shoppers the perfect gift this season: the right offer, the right message, the right experience at the right moment. Good intentions are the easy part. Delivering an experience shoppers actually want is where a lot of brands are about to get it wrong.
Expectations are muted, and rising costs are a big part of why. Total U.S. retail sales for November and December 2026 are forecast to rise 4.1%, the second straight year holiday growth trails the full-year average, according to eMarketer.
In our new holiday report with eTail Insights, Delivering the 2026 Holiday Shopping Season, we asked 100 retailers and 1,348 shoppers how they see the season ahead. They agree shoppers are under real financial pressure. They don't agree on what to do about it, and that's where the season gets decided.


Take the 8-question peak-readiness assessment and see where you stand in about five minutes.
Forty percent of retailers expect shoppers to be more price-conscious and deal-driven this year, a read they tie directly to rising prices.
Shoppers confirm the pressure, but not the conclusion. Sixty-three percent say they'll spend more than last year even as 65% describe themselves as anxious about the season. Those two facts aren't in conflict. A shopper can compare prices, wait for sales, and still spend more overall, because prices are higher, baskets are bigger, or gift-giving simply isn't optional.
The takeaway: shoppers are ready to spend, but they're watching closely, and the retailers who deliver a low-risk, high-confidence experience are the ones who earn that spend, with or without a discount. Here's where retailers and shoppers agree, where they don't, and what separates the two.
Not every mismatch matters equally. Some gaps are minor. Others are the retail equivalent of a well-meant gift that gets quietly returned the day after Christmas. These are the ones that move revenue and loyalty this season.
Fifty-two percent of retailers say shipping costs and free-shipping availability will most influence how shoppers buy this season, a full 10 points ahead of product price and discounts. Shoppers do care about shipping. Seventy-six percent would accept slower delivery in exchange for a free option. But ranked against everything else, shipping lands third for shoppers, behind product price (54%) and a reliable delivery date (50%), with shipping at 48%.
The move: Keep free shipping as a default lever, but don't let it crowd out the two things shoppers rank just as high: clear pricing and a delivery date they can trust.
Shoppers are telling retailers exactly what matters most.
70% of shoppers say an accurate delivery date at checkout is very important when making a holiday purchase, the highest-rated factor in the entire consumer survey.
While 70% of shoppers say an accurate EDD is very important when making a holiday purchase, only about half of retailers treat real-time delivery dates at checkout as a top conversion tactic. Nearly half are leaving the single strongest reason-to-buy on the table. Showing a date only works if the date holds. A promise that slips does more damage than no promise at all.
The upside when retailers get it right is real: Harry Rosen saw a 13-point lift in conversion on harryrosen.com and a 20-point lift on FinalCut after building that confidence into checkout.
The move: Treat delivery-date accuracy as the conversion tactic it already is, and invest in keeping the promise, not just displaying it.
The returns and refund experience is one of the last moments a brand can still make a strong impression on a shopper who didn't get what they wanted the first time. It's also where retailers and shoppers are furthest apart. Eighty-nine percent of shoppers say they're more likely to shop with a retailer that gets refunds back quickly, and retailer investment trails that demand by more than any other finding in the study. Of every gap in the report, this is the widest.
The move: Treat returns and refunds as a retention lever, not a cost to contain. The distance between a return and a refund is doing more work than the ops team gets credit for.
Fifty-eight percent of shoppers say they're starting earlier this year, and 75% expect to begin in October or early November, regardless of what retailers do to encourage it. Retailers have noticed the shift, but more than three-quarters have no plan to act on it. Capturing that demand is about visibility, not price. A shipping deadline tells an already-motivated shopper when to order to make the holiday. A low-stock signal tells them what's still available. Neither needs a discount attached.
The move: Skip the discount if you want, but don't skip the outreach. Put a deadline or a visibility signal in front of early shoppers now, while the demand is already there.
Retailer confidence in AI is broad but shallow. Every retailer surveyed feels at least somewhat confident using AI to improve the post-purchase experience, but only 8% call themselves very confident. Shoppers aren't waiting. A majority already plan to use AI for at least one part of their holiday shopping this year. The demand exists whether or not retailers feel ready for it.
The move: Don't let internal hesitation slow shopper-facing AI. The risk this season isn't moving too fast, it's moving slower than the shopper already is.
65% of shoppers plan to use AI in their holiday shopping, but only 8% of retailers feel very confident in their AI capabilities.
The season isn't only about missed signals. The report also maps where retailers and shoppers are already reading things the same way, including proactive issue resolution before it becomes a support problem, and AI-powered delivery-date prediction as a long-term investment. Those points of agreement are worth protecting through peak, not just the gaps worth closing. The full report breaks down both, with the retailer and shopper numbers side by side.
The retailers who win this season won't have the biggest budgets or the flashiest promotions. They'll be the ones who listened, and matched their shipping strategy, delivery promises, return policies, and AI investments to what shoppers are actually asking for.
Good intentions were never the problem. The retailers who turn intention into an experience shoppers actually feel are practicing what post-purchase is really about: brand hospitality, or how taken-care-of a shopper feels in every moment after the sale. An experience that's accurate, fast, low-friction, and personal is what turns a single holiday purchase into a lasting relationship, and it's a gift worth getting right.

The complete eTail Insights + Narvar 2026 holiday report has every benchmark behind these findings.
Refund speed. Shopper demand for fast refunds far outpaces retailer investment, making it the widest gap in this year's study. Shipping assumptions, delivery-date accuracy, and early-shopping outreach are the other major gaps. The readiness assessment shows which one your strategy is most exposed to.
No. Retailers rank shipping as the top purchase driver, but shoppers rank it third, behind product price and a reliable delivery date. Shoppers care about shipping (76% would accept slower delivery for a free option), it's just not their No. 1.
The two aren't in conflict. Shoppers can hunt for deals and still spend more overall, because prices are higher, baskets are bigger, or gift-giving isn't optional. Financial anxiety and higher spend intent are showing up at the same time.
Not necessarily. A discount alone won't be what draws early shoppers in. A shipping deadline or a low-stock signal gives an already-motivated shopper a reason to buy now, without a markdown.
Yes. Most shoppers already plan to use AI for at least one part of their holiday shopping. Retailer confidence is far more cautious, with only 8% saying they're very confident in their own AI capabilities.